• Proposed
  • 2Under Assessment
  • 3Preliminary Assessed
  • 4Assessed
  • 5Published

Diorygma poitaei (Fée) Kalb, Staiger & Elix

Search for another Species...

Scientific name
Diorygma poitaei
(Fée) Kalb, Staiger & Elix
Common names
IUCN Specialist Group
Assessment status
Proposed by
Isaias de Oliveira Junior
Comments etc.
Isaias de Oliveira Junior

Assessment Notes

Taxonomic notes

This species is known by its creamy to pale grey or greenish grey thallus, more or less flexuous and branched immersed lirellae, hyaline and muriform ascospores, 40–65 × 10–18 μm, 4–8 per ascus (Kalb et al., 2004, Caceres, 2007).

Why suggested for a Global Red List Assessment?

This is species is known in 21 countries, with 415 records in GBIF database. Also, known as species related to the New World. In Brazil, this species records are related to Atlantic Rainforest and Amazon Rainforest. Due to all the previous information this species might be considered as Least Concern (LC) until a better understanding.

Geographic range

This is species is known in 224 countries. In Brazil, 185 occurrences to this species are known, located in South, Southeast, Midwest, North and Northeast of Brazil according to GBIF database.

Population and Trends

There are 415 records in GBIF database, distributed in Brazil (185 records), The United States fo America (49 records), Costa Rica (31 records), and the other occurrences are distributed in small percentages.

Population Trend:

Habitat and Ecology

This species is related to the New World, so this species occurs really well in Tropical to Subtropical Rainforest, Mangrove Swamps from sea level up to the Lower Montane Zone. In Brazil, this species can be found at the Atlantic Rainforest and Amazon Rainforest.

Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland ForestSubtropical/Tropical Mangrove Forest Vegetation Above High Tide LevelSubtropical/Tropical Swamp ForestSubtropical/Tropical Moist Montane Forest


In Brazil, this species commonly founded in Atlantic and Amazon Rainforest that are biomes that still suffer anthropic actions in special wildfire, natural and criminal caused, and area suppression.

Tourism & recreation areasSmall-holder farmingAgro-industry farmingSmall-holder plantationsAgro-industry plantationsRoads & railroadsUnintentional effects (species being assessed is not the target)Increase in fire frequency/intensityHabitat shifting & alteration

Conservation Actions

In Brazil, the records are related to preserved areas, but unfortunately, those spaces still being affected by negatives influences. So, formal education to the population that lives near those areas and the park managers can start to change the situation.

Resource & habitat protectionHabitat & natural process restorationFormal education

Research needed

Actions that are orientated to taxonomy and exploration to new sites need to be stimulated until a better understanding of this species status.

TaxonomyPopulation size, distribution & trends

Use and Trade



Country occurrence

Regional Population and Trends

Country Trend Redlisted