• Proposed
  • Under Assessment
  • DDPreliminary Assessed
  • 4Assessed
  • 5Published

Cantharellus fissilis Fr.

Search for another Species...

Scientific name
Cantharellus fissilis
Author
Fr.
Common names
 
IUCN Specialist Group
Mushroom, Bracket and Puffball
Kingdom
Fungi
Phylum
Basidiomycota
Class
Agaricomycetes
Order
Cantharellales
Family
Cantharellaceae
Assessment status
Preliminary Assessed
Preliminary Category
DD
Proposed by
Christine Tansey
Assessors
James Westrip, Christine Tansey
Contributors
Ibai Olariaga Ibarguren

Assessment Notes

Justification

Since the description of Cantherellus fissilis there appears to be a single record of the species, but that is considered to be unconfirmed. With a lack of occurrence data and information on the habitat and ecology of the species it is not possible to assess the status of its population or distribution. It is therefore assessed as Data Deficient.


Taxonomic notes

Cantharellus fissilis was described by E.M. Fries in 1821 in Sytema Mycologicum.

Index Fungorum lists Cyphella fissilis (Fr.) Berk. as a homotypic synonym.

Based on the description it is not cantharelloid, although difficult to interprete (I. Olariaga Ibarguren in litt. 2022).


Why suggested for a Global Red List Assessment?

Chanterelle species to be assessed as part of the chanterelle comprehensive project.


Geographic range

Based on its listing for the homotypic synonym Cyphella fissilis, it was described from Sweden (Saccardo 1895), although that is not clear from the type description (see Fries 1821). This is also a single observation from the UK on GBIF, dated 1837, but it is considered unconfirmed (see GBIF 2023).


Population and Trends

It is not possible to accurately estimate the population size and trend.

Population Trend: Uncertain


Habitat and Ecology

The type is described as occurring in October-November on tree trunks, highlighting Beech, but the extent of habitat is unknown (Fries 1821).

Temperate Forest

Threats

It is not possible to accurately assess what threats this species may be facing without additional, more recent information.


Conservation Actions


Research needed

Confirmation of its taxonomic status, population and distribution data and ecology are required to better assess this species.

TaxonomyPopulation size, distribution & trendsLife history & ecologyThreats

Use and Trade

There is no use/trade information.


Bibliography


Country occurrence

Regional Population and Trends

Country Trend Redlisted